"

I’m an actuary, so of course I made a spreadsheet. Six sites, three months, columns for subscription cost, number of messages sent, number of replies, and eventually first dates. Hinge had the best reply rate per message but the worst ‘still talking after two weeks’ rate. OkCupid was cheap and full of good writers but half of them lived ninety minutes away. Match.com, which I’d assumed was for my parents’ generation, had the highest cost per month at around forty dollars but the lowest flake rate — people who said they’d show up actually showed up.

By week seven my data said Match was ‘winning,’ but I still hadn’t had a date I wanted a second one of. Then a woman named Denise messaged me first, which never happened anywhere else, and her opener was just: ‘Your profile has a typo in paragraph two and I respect that you didn’t proofread for a stranger.’ We met at a diner because she picked it, ordered the same weird combo of hash browns and rye toast I always get, and told me flat out she’d also been tracking her own dating-site data on a notes app, just less obsessively than me.

We’ve been together fourteen months now and still joke about the spreadsheet, which I finally deleted the week we moved in together. The lesson wasn’t that Match.com is objectively the best site — I genuinely think the ‘best’ one depends on what you’re bad at hiding, and mine was overthinking. It’s that the metric that actually mattered wasn’t reply rate or cost per date, it was whether I could sit across from someone eating hash browns and stop performing. Denise was the first person on any app where I forgot I was supposed to be tracking anything.

P
Submitted by P.
Together 14 months · App-Picking