"

After my second bad breakup in a year, I decided I was going to be scientific about this. I made a Google Sheet with columns for app source, response time, first-message quality, and something I called the ‘follow-up rate’ — basically, did they ask a second question or just say ‘lol same.’ I was on Hinge, Bumble, and one running-club-specific app called Long Distance, and by week six I had 47 rows filled in. A guy named with a J who worked in logistics scored an 8.5 out of 10 for consistently texting back within twenty minutes. A guy I’ll just call ‘Pierogi Guy’ scored a 3 because he took two days to respond to my prompt about the worst haircut I’d ever had, and when he finally did, his answer was just ‘lol nice.’

I went out with the 8.5 guy three times. Nice enough, always on time, ordered for both of us without asking, which I now realize was a small red flag I filed under ‘confident.’ Meanwhile Pierogi Guy kept resurfacing in my queue because his profile had a photo of him holding a dachshund at what was clearly a Polish deli, and out of morbid curiosity more than romance, I finally said yes to a date. He showed up eleven minutes late in a coat with a broken zipper and immediately apologized by buying me an entire tray of pierogi I hadn’t asked for.

We talked for four hours in a booth that smelled like cabbage and sour cream, and he told me about the time he got lost hiking in Poland for six hours because he refused to admit he couldn’t read the trail markers. I laughed so hard I choked on a potato dumpling. I never updated his score in the spreadsheet. Three months later he’s still showing up late, still can’t admit when he’s lost, and I’ve deleted the entire tracking system because it turns out the thing that actually predicts compatibility isn’t response time — it’s whether someone can make you laugh with cabbage breath in a diner booth at midnight.

M
Submitted by M.
Together 5 months · Lesson Learned